tonyHK12
05-19 11:59 AM
Arnold's Baby Mama Is Guatemalan Migrant : Barbados Gazette (http://www.barbadosgazette.com/arnold%E2%80%99s-baby-mama-is-guatemalan-migrant/)
wallpaper Lady Gaga Poker Face Lyrics
kirupa
04-16 01:46 AM
Oh no - I really really liked your Swift 3D text. I meant the 5c. Sorry about the confusion. The Swift 3D text is part of their logo. You can't change that :P
wandmaker
06-27 11:37 AM
Hi All,
Joined California based consulting company in mid 2006, got project in Maryland(MD). Worked in Maryland but CA company ran payroll on CA address. I have LCA for Maryland. End of year,2006 filed tax filing with CA state.
Project went till February,2008 they are running my pay stubs,W2 with CA address. I filed CA tax returns for year 2007 but stayed in Maryland.
Now my questions is I�m present in Maryland(LCA) but pay stubs,W2 are showing CA address. In demographic information form(g-325) which I address I need to use. Should I go with physical address(Maryland) or W2 address(CA).
I have no idea how to go about this, can you please advice how to present my case.
Thanks,
Sampath.
In G325, you should specify the address where you lived. On the other hand, though your W2 says CA address, you should have filed taxes with Maryland and filed taxes with CA as non-resident.
Joined California based consulting company in mid 2006, got project in Maryland(MD). Worked in Maryland but CA company ran payroll on CA address. I have LCA for Maryland. End of year,2006 filed tax filing with CA state.
Project went till February,2008 they are running my pay stubs,W2 with CA address. I filed CA tax returns for year 2007 but stayed in Maryland.
Now my questions is I�m present in Maryland(LCA) but pay stubs,W2 are showing CA address. In demographic information form(g-325) which I address I need to use. Should I go with physical address(Maryland) or W2 address(CA).
I have no idea how to go about this, can you please advice how to present my case.
Thanks,
Sampath.
In G325, you should specify the address where you lived. On the other hand, though your W2 says CA address, you should have filed taxes with Maryland and filed taxes with CA as non-resident.
2011 Lady Gaga#39;s latest London
logiclife
06-04 01:45 PM
I guess we should ask them to remove the employer's restriction, which is the prime reason for extreme exploitation. H1b should not be restricitive. IV should also address the same. We are looking at the current problem with retrogression only, but what about future aspirants who come on H1.
H1B quota and H1B related issues are not primary concern of this organization. Greencard retrogression is. It has been that way since the inception 18 months ago.
We have taken positions to make H1B more workable and have less restrictions on it regarding H1 extensions and H1 transfers and therby opposed major portions of Durbin-Grassley.
HOwever, right now is not the time to debate and have open discussion on flaws of H1B program.
This is distraction at minimum and ammo for anti-groups in worst case scenario. Please contribute, send webfaxes, make phones and provide live updates and save this discussion on H1B flaws for slower times.
H1B quota and H1B related issues are not primary concern of this organization. Greencard retrogression is. It has been that way since the inception 18 months ago.
We have taken positions to make H1B more workable and have less restrictions on it regarding H1 extensions and H1 transfers and therby opposed major portions of Durbin-Grassley.
HOwever, right now is not the time to debate and have open discussion on flaws of H1B program.
This is distraction at minimum and ammo for anti-groups in worst case scenario. Please contribute, send webfaxes, make phones and provide live updates and save this discussion on H1B flaws for slower times.
more...
gvenkat
05-04 08:53 PM
You might be better off checking a canadian forum. From what I read it seems it takes a while. I can't believe that those idiots can't give us an on entry visa. Sigh!!!
newbie2020
01-27 03:55 PM
Thanks for sharing, It describes about Numerical limit not apply during Quarter which means spillover should occur quarterly. I don't think they follow that today.
more...
GotFreedom?
07-24 01:46 PM
Your H1-B visa approval notice for the new employer comes with the new I-94 when you renew/transfer it, that is valid till the visa expiration date on the notice. Check the apporval notice and there must be a detachable perforation at the bottom which says I-94 on it. This new I-94 needs to be attached to your passport. If you do not have it, ask your employer, they might have it. Legally, you should have that I-94 in your possession.
2010 wallpaper Lady GaGa: Leaving
hopelessGC
04-15 12:11 PM
Got mine in November 2008. No issues at all.
From Mumbai
From Mumbai
more...
delhiguy79
07-23 09:01 AM
...
hair Lady Gaga was spotted leaving
ssdtm
06-24 10:10 PM
Do we need to send the copy or the original of the Employment letter for filing 485?
more...
preety79
11-06 01:32 PM
I�m in EB2 and My I-140 was approved on March 2009 through Employer A. After which I moved to India and now am back (Nov 2010) with Employer B. My old Employer A has my apporved I-140.
It would be great if I get answer the below my Question:
1. Can I apply for I-485 with my new employer B based on my approved 140?? OR
2. Do I need to go back to my old employer A to apply my I-485. If yes is there any specific time period to go back to my old employer A.
Thanks for your help.
preety
It would be great if I get answer the below my Question:
1. Can I apply for I-485 with my new employer B based on my approved 140?? OR
2. Do I need to go back to my old employer A to apply my I-485. If yes is there any specific time period to go back to my old employer A.
Thanks for your help.
preety
hot images lady gaga without
neeidd
07-14 01:00 PM
HI Gurus,
I need advice from you guys,
My priority date is June 2005 (EB2) and my I-485 receipt date is July 7th 2007 at TSC
My questions regarding Writ of Mandamus are
1. Would I be qualified to file for Writ of Mandamus (WOM)?
2. If I am qualified, would it be of any benefit for me to file WOM based on my criteria as
detailed above?
Thanks a lot.
I need advice from you guys,
My priority date is June 2005 (EB2) and my I-485 receipt date is July 7th 2007 at TSC
My questions regarding Writ of Mandamus are
1. Would I be qualified to file for Writ of Mandamus (WOM)?
2. If I am qualified, would it be of any benefit for me to file WOM based on my criteria as
detailed above?
Thanks a lot.
more...
house Lady Gaga Lady Gaga hands out
cokeraj
08-14 08:04 PM
I was just wondering if they stall the 485 processing once they issue an RFE on EAD. Would they hold the case in abeyance or are these two mutually exclusive.
Btw, am not sure of the reason for RFE yet.
Has anyone had their 485 approved with an RFE pending on EAD or AP?
EB2-I
PD: June 2004
I140 Approved: Aug 2006
485 RD: July 26, 2007
RFE on EAD: Aug 6, 2008
Btw, am not sure of the reason for RFE yet.
Has anyone had their 485 approved with an RFE pending on EAD or AP?
EB2-I
PD: June 2004
I140 Approved: Aug 2006
485 RD: July 26, 2007
RFE on EAD: Aug 6, 2008
tattoo Lady Gaga leaving her hotel in
rodnyb
03-03 01:12 PM
http://kpkgs.com/files/The_Employment_Based_Green_Card_Process_and_the_Dr amatic_Negative_Impact_of_Country_Based_Quotas_on_ persons_of_Indian_Origin_Feb_20102.pdf
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
more...
pictures Lady GaGa Laves Her Hotel to
Dhundhun
10-08 04:05 AM
How come someone with Indian Passport enter USA on Canadian PR?
dresses (15-10-Lady-GaGa-Leave)
emailrob
10-27 03:48 PM
Well they could hurry up and approve my eb1-c that's been pending for 8 months despite them saying 4 is their target! I can't see how they can say not enough applications when they are way off their targets for poor souls like me. I've put in an SR so we'll see what happens
more...
makeup Lady Gaga was spotted leaving
485Question
10-05 04:32 PM
Interesting cartoons, they have a lot on immigration.
girlfriend Lady Gaga posing with fans
axp817
08-02 11:32 AM
June 6 2006
hairstyles Lady Gaga is known for taking
amitk81
09-05 06:37 AM
it is $300 (150 for you and 150 for your wife)
I paid the same in Mumbai last week.
I paid the same in Mumbai last week.
jamesingham
04-11 11:38 AM
Hello,
My wife is currently on H4 status. (Just the I-94, her visa expired last year October). She started her MS in Fall 2009. She already competed 2 Semesters of MS on H4 visa. We applied for her Change of Status to F1 visa in March. According to the USCIS processing dates, she will get the COS approved approximately in June 1st week.
She will have to travel to India this summer. The question we have is,
is it advisable to wait till she gets her F1 COS Approved and then go to India for F1 Stamping ?
or abandon the F1 COS and go for F1 stamping directly in India ?
Please advice if there are any risks involved here.
My wife is currently on H4 status. (Just the I-94, her visa expired last year October). She started her MS in Fall 2009. She already competed 2 Semesters of MS on H4 visa. We applied for her Change of Status to F1 visa in March. According to the USCIS processing dates, she will get the COS approved approximately in June 1st week.
She will have to travel to India this summer. The question we have is,
is it advisable to wait till she gets her F1 COS Approved and then go to India for F1 Stamping ?
or abandon the F1 COS and go for F1 stamping directly in India ?
Please advice if there are any risks involved here.
H1b_to_GC
06-03 10:51 PM
Hi all,
Need your advise. I have an approved PERM Labor (2006)
Also filed for I-485 in July 2007, got EAD, AP.
Lately i noticed that my Date Of Birth is incorrect in page 5 of ETA 9089 Labor Form. This error is in section J Alien Information.
How should i correct it? Please advise.
Need your advise. I have an approved PERM Labor (2006)
Also filed for I-485 in July 2007, got EAD, AP.
Lately i noticed that my Date Of Birth is incorrect in page 5 of ETA 9089 Labor Form. This error is in section J Alien Information.
How should i correct it? Please advise.
No comments:
Post a Comment