kpraveenn
01-24 02:32 PM
Hi Guys,
I need your opinions/suggestion regarding the following:
I am working as a software professional, my job is a permanent full time job.
I got a labor certification and 140 is still in the process. I am willing to own a company and buying 100% of its shares(not a listed company). The company is incorporated in the state of Michigan. It is a small business company. I will not be serving the company's operations in regular hours and will not be actively involved in the day to day business. I will not be given any designation in the company.
I have the following questions if I own this company:
1. will this have any effect on my current or future any stages(140/485) of Green Card If I own this company.
2. After I own the company, Can I transfer the company profit funds from company bank account to my personal account.
3. Is it possible to own a company without any designation given.
4. After i own this company, will it be treated as I have 2 jobs.
Thank you so much for you time and reading this post.
Please let me know if anyone has any opinion(s) in this situation.
by - voice of a fellow immigration applicant
I need your opinions/suggestion regarding the following:
I am working as a software professional, my job is a permanent full time job.
I got a labor certification and 140 is still in the process. I am willing to own a company and buying 100% of its shares(not a listed company). The company is incorporated in the state of Michigan. It is a small business company. I will not be serving the company's operations in regular hours and will not be actively involved in the day to day business. I will not be given any designation in the company.
I have the following questions if I own this company:
1. will this have any effect on my current or future any stages(140/485) of Green Card If I own this company.
2. After I own the company, Can I transfer the company profit funds from company bank account to my personal account.
3. Is it possible to own a company without any designation given.
4. After i own this company, will it be treated as I have 2 jobs.
Thank you so much for you time and reading this post.
Please let me know if anyone has any opinion(s) in this situation.
by - voice of a fellow immigration applicant
wallpaper FUNNY DANCE. 120 views
vshar
03-11 12:53 PM
My wife got her h1B stamping done on 2/2/10 at Delhi embassy. It was smooth and they asked for 797 and the passport and then asked what her company does and what her spouse does( as she changed her status from H4 to F1 to H1B). that's all.
jaocanada
05-18 09:53 AM
The Priority Date box on I-140 shows the priority date alright. But the one on I-1485 is blank. Please can any one check their I-485s and let know if you are also in the same situation?
Thanks!
Thanks!
2011 Free Funny Pictures
adfrn111
01-09 11:08 PM
thanks
more...
CCC
04-20 07:01 PM
If appropiate can one of the administrators tell us how much of the funds collected thus far have been used (for whatever purposes). I am not asking where the money went :-), just basically how much is left in the Kitty now. If we are running low i am hoping we will see a spur of new donations..
Before anybody asks; yes i have contributed to IV. $600 as of now. I plan to send in another $100 or $200 by end of the month.
PS- Of course as i said above please disclose this info only if its deemed not sensitive.
Before anybody asks; yes i have contributed to IV. $600 as of now. I plan to send in another $100 or $200 by end of the month.
PS- Of course as i said above please disclose this info only if its deemed not sensitive.
dassumi
11-08 12:22 PM
Reminded me of an incident when I was a teenager, a budding cricketer and was a huge fan of Nike sports shoes. I would see these uncles with big paunches wearing Nike and would think that the world is unfair that people like me don't get to wear Nike while random uncles do. Completely random thought!!!!
The point being - the situation we are in, we hope that our plight should be a discussion point in every conversation that India and US ensue in. It crossed my mind a couple of times that we should have pushed for it. State of mind I guess.
Do you think anyone will even mention (hopefully get solutions) the eb backlogs to the President when he is touring India? Do you think anything good might come out of it for us?
The point being - the situation we are in, we hope that our plight should be a discussion point in every conversation that India and US ensue in. It crossed my mind a couple of times that we should have pushed for it. State of mind I guess.
Do you think anyone will even mention (hopefully get solutions) the eb backlogs to the President when he is touring India? Do you think anything good might come out of it for us?
more...
anil.kudumulap@gmail.com
06-22 07:29 AM
Thank you Sanjay. I'll do that any other suggestions?
2010 funny dancing. funny dance
moonrah
12-26 05:10 PM
Hi,
My company prepared for my PERM filing in EB2 category. They did all recruitement efforts. But at the time of filing, company annouced some lay-offs as "restructuring". Now my lawyer says, it is their policy not to file for PERM before six months of any lay -offs since some lay -offs involve same job title as my labor supposed to be filed. Since this is my lawyer's policy, My question is, is it safe to file PERM right now? What if I use different job title then the one my lawyer used before for recruitement efforts. (I understand he has to do new recruitement efforts for this ne job title, but is it safe?). What choices do I have, I do not want to delay my PERM filing. Please help...
Thanks
My company prepared for my PERM filing in EB2 category. They did all recruitement efforts. But at the time of filing, company annouced some lay-offs as "restructuring". Now my lawyer says, it is their policy not to file for PERM before six months of any lay -offs since some lay -offs involve same job title as my labor supposed to be filed. Since this is my lawyer's policy, My question is, is it safe to file PERM right now? What if I use different job title then the one my lawyer used before for recruitement efforts. (I understand he has to do new recruitement efforts for this ne job title, but is it safe?). What choices do I have, I do not want to delay my PERM filing. Please help...
Thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
06-09 02:10 PM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXB6Y23nBwiaKmrZQpCqHQiMx4XVHfQntooCHYusr0PH4j2xdc3zEtoF4tnLujZv2F8fZpnt7Rja73INJrSg3lTm7meuD-5ea2H5OxBp4vQ627GjtjmnTNMdXRFOHYOSALozqbB0zPdJNU/s200/gay+wedding.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXB6Y23nBwiaKmrZQpCqHQiMx4XVHfQntooCHYusr0PH4j2xdc3zEtoF4tnLujZv2F8fZpnt7Rja73INJrSg3lTm7meuD-5ea2H5OxBp4vQ627GjtjmnTNMdXRFOHYOSALozqbB0zPdJNU/s1600-h/gay+wedding.jpg)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
hair at Pound Doing Funny Dance
ssprof
08-02 07:08 PM
I googled it
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb-rr-31-uscis-sop-02-0807.pdf
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb-rr-31-uscis-sop-02-0807.pdf
more...
pappu
08-22 02:26 PM
Tikka will be interviewed. Thanks Tikka for helping us despite being busy at work when nobody else came forward.
hot do a funny, funny dance.
jonty_11
05-22 03:22 PM
Just convert ur status to illegal and u will be all set.....
more...
house very funny dance routine
Bobby Digital
October 19th, 2005, 07:23 PM
There is always an ad for rain gear in the back of photo mags by this one company...I can't think of their name at the moment but I'll find it when I get home. Stuff looks pretty neat.
I've seen those ads, but wonder how effective the products are. I bought one after seeing it in an add and it fits perfect with my 300 but with smaller lenses it's to big. I was hoping I might hear from someone who has one for a smaller lense (17-80 ish).
Bobby D.
I've seen those ads, but wonder how effective the products are. I bought one after seeing it in an add and it fits perfect with my 300 but with smaller lenses it's to big. I was hoping I might hear from someone who has one for a smaller lense (17-80 ish).
Bobby D.
tattoo Embarrassing Dancing - funny
Blog Feeds
04-09 09:30 AM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/Magnify%20Glass.jpgIn our blog of yesterday (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/border-guards-will-finally-use.html), 1 April 2010, we mentioned the new screening procedures at US ports of entry (POE). Fong & Chun's clients travel a great deal, passing through Los Angeles and other immigration ports of entry. As lawyers to so many travelers, we try to provide accurate information about border issues. We have learned a little more about the new screening protocol.
In the past, all citizens of certain countries believed to be supporters of terrorism would all be scrutinized indiscriminately. Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Sudan are widely believed to have been on this list of soi-disant unfriendly countries. Citizens of other countries -- perceived as "friendly" to the USA -- would be subject to less scrutiny.
The new POE screening procedures use intelligence-based threat assessments. This information will be applied to all persons arriving at a POE, including Americans. If border guards have intelligence that -- let's pretend for a moment -- a university-age male student from Africa might be trying to engage in dangerous activity, then the border guards would be on the lookout for university-age male students from Africa. In contrast, university-age male students from, say, Malaysia, M�xico, Moldova, Monaco, or Myanmar would not be subject to the same scrutiny.
This new, intelligence-based approach makes the most of the information provided by US intelligence sources without painting everyone with an indiscriminately broad brush. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/all-travelers-subject-to-revie.html)
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/Magnify%20Glass.jpgIn our blog of yesterday (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/border-guards-will-finally-use.html), 1 April 2010, we mentioned the new screening procedures at US ports of entry (POE). Fong & Chun's clients travel a great deal, passing through Los Angeles and other immigration ports of entry. As lawyers to so many travelers, we try to provide accurate information about border issues. We have learned a little more about the new screening protocol.
In the past, all citizens of certain countries believed to be supporters of terrorism would all be scrutinized indiscriminately. Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Sudan are widely believed to have been on this list of soi-disant unfriendly countries. Citizens of other countries -- perceived as "friendly" to the USA -- would be subject to less scrutiny.
The new POE screening procedures use intelligence-based threat assessments. This information will be applied to all persons arriving at a POE, including Americans. If border guards have intelligence that -- let's pretend for a moment -- a university-age male student from Africa might be trying to engage in dangerous activity, then the border guards would be on the lookout for university-age male students from Africa. In contrast, university-age male students from, say, Malaysia, M�xico, Moldova, Monaco, or Myanmar would not be subject to the same scrutiny.
This new, intelligence-based approach makes the most of the information provided by US intelligence sources without painting everyone with an indiscriminately broad brush. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/all-travelers-subject-to-revie.html)
more...
pictures Funny Dance Moves-Zambian
EndRetro
07-05 08:44 AM
Hi,
I filed my 485 in Dec 2004.My PD is June 2004.
Got married in 2005.
If (Less Probability..) i get my 485 approved and not able to add my Spouse's to my 485.
What would be my Options.
Please advice.
if you got married before the approval of I-485 you can file for your spouse's 485 even after your 485 id approved. Search for "follow to join" clause, this has it covered.
I filed my 485 in Dec 2004.My PD is June 2004.
Got married in 2005.
If (Less Probability..) i get my 485 approved and not able to add my Spouse's to my 485.
What would be my Options.
Please advice.
if you got married before the approval of I-485 you can file for your spouse's 485 even after your 485 id approved. Search for "follow to join" clause, this has it covered.
dresses brads funny dance
mps
07-25 12:47 PM
My sponsoring company changed its� legal name on January 1, 2008 for some restructuring reasons. I got saved, as I�m July 2, 2007 I-485 filer (I ended up completing 6 months after I-485 with filing employer).
Our corporate attorney has advised us that, they would invoke AC21 only if RFE received.
Now, I�m looking else where for a new job � I plan to invoke AC21 only if RFE is received. However, I�m concerned that my employer may try to revoke I-140 (Note # On Behest of my �Desi� manager who has pinned me down on several occasions due to my pending GC application)
My question is � since filing employer no longer exists (legally), would my current employer be able to revoke I-140?
I would appreciate insight from Guru�s on this forum!
Our corporate attorney has advised us that, they would invoke AC21 only if RFE received.
Now, I�m looking else where for a new job � I plan to invoke AC21 only if RFE is received. However, I�m concerned that my employer may try to revoke I-140 (Note # On Behest of my �Desi� manager who has pinned me down on several occasions due to my pending GC application)
My question is � since filing employer no longer exists (legally), would my current employer be able to revoke I-140?
I would appreciate insight from Guru�s on this forum!
more...
makeup Funny Dance by ~jetaun on deviantART
CCC
04-13 01:39 PM
Hello,
My wife and I both work for the same company and my PD date is 1 year behind my wifes. But she was born in Germany though she is currently an Indian citizen. Now that the ROW category has moved passed her PD's date (Nov 6th 2002), we plan to file under the ROW category using the Cross Chargability rules. Does anybody have any experience filing under this rule? We have her birth certificate (translated into English from German etc) and our lawyers will send us the list of documents i expect. So basically i am trying to find out what to expect when filing under this category. Are there any caveats, good to knows etc?
PS- I am also an Indian citizen but i will obviously piggy back on her application since my PD is not current.
My wife and I both work for the same company and my PD date is 1 year behind my wifes. But she was born in Germany though she is currently an Indian citizen. Now that the ROW category has moved passed her PD's date (Nov 6th 2002), we plan to file under the ROW category using the Cross Chargability rules. Does anybody have any experience filing under this rule? We have her birth certificate (translated into English from German etc) and our lawyers will send us the list of documents i expect. So basically i am trying to find out what to expect when filing under this category. Are there any caveats, good to knows etc?
PS- I am also an Indian citizen but i will obviously piggy back on her application since my PD is not current.
girlfriend dance quotes funny. dance
spicy_guy
06-15 11:33 AM
1 million? I thought 140K is max per year.
hairstyles sport funny. Dance Sport funny
ahiyer
09-26 08:57 PM
Hi,
I am trying to find health insurance for my spouse who is in H4 visa.
Could you please let me know if I can buy the health insurance only for her? Is there some law which states H1B visa holder also needs to buy the health insurance along with the spouse?
BTW, I am living in NJ.
Appreciate, your inputs and pointers on this issue.
Thanks,
I am trying to find health insurance for my spouse who is in H4 visa.
Could you please let me know if I can buy the health insurance only for her? Is there some law which states H1B visa holder also needs to buy the health insurance along with the spouse?
BTW, I am living in NJ.
Appreciate, your inputs and pointers on this issue.
Thanks,
vphope
06-05 03:29 PM
You can use EAD with current employer. I think your company has to do the change your I9 form to EAD. You don't need to inform as you are not changing any company.
Appreciate your quick response Vikramy, Thanks
Appreciate your quick response Vikramy, Thanks
a_paradkar
07-15 11:55 AM
I just called USCIS to check the status of my case and the Immigration Officer said it is in EB-1 category. I know my case is EB-2.
I asked the IO to see if i have send any paperwork to rectify their mistake, but she said USCIS will automatically adjust the category whe it picks up the case for review
I am confused. Please Advice
PD: Aug 2005
EB2 - I
140 receipt says 203(b)(2)
140 Approved
I asked the IO to see if i have send any paperwork to rectify their mistake, but she said USCIS will automatically adjust the category whe it picks up the case for review
I am confused. Please Advice
PD: Aug 2005
EB2 - I
140 receipt says 203(b)(2)
140 Approved
No comments:
Post a Comment